[国会记录158卷，85号（星期四，2012年6月7日）] [家]美国国土安全[页面H3618-H3652]署拨款法案，2013 [...]整块修订主动提出Aderholt ADERHOLT先生。主席先生，我在办公桌修正案整块的，我会问一致同意该修正案被视为读。代理主席。有反对从阿拉巴马君子的要求吗？没有人反对。代理主席。秘书会指定的修订。修正案的文本如下：在该法案结束（前的简称），插入以下内容：秒。__。资金没有提供该法可以通过国土安全部可以使用任何其他联邦机构，以租赁或购买新的轻型车辆，任何行政舰队，或者一个机构的舰队库存，除依照总统Memorandum-联邦舰队性能方面，5月24日，2011年____秒。 __. None of the funds made available by this Act may be used for the purchase, operation, or maintenance of armed unmanned aerial vehicles. ____ Sec. __. None of the funds made available under this Act may be used in contravention of immigration laws (as defined in session 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))). The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to the order of the House of today, the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Aderholt) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Alabama. Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Chairman, this amendment combines three separate amendments which were outlined in our unanimous consent agreement earlier. The first, from Mr. Engel, has a limitation on funds for the lease or purchase of new light-duty vehicles that are not in accordance with the President's fleet efficiency standards. {time} 1940 The second amendment is from Mr. Holt. It is a limitation on funds for the use of armored, unmanned aerial systems. And the third is from Mr. Price of Georgia. It's a limitation on funds being used in contravention of the Nation's immigration laws. I would urge my colleagues to support the adoption of this en bloc amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington is recognized for 5 minutes. Mr. DICKS. If I can ask the chairman a question on this, it says none of the funds made available by this act may be used for the purchase, operation, or maintenance of armed unmanned aerial vehicles; is this from Homeland Security? Is this prohibition on Homeland Security? Mr. ADERHOLT. That is correct. Mr. DICKS. Has there ever been any plan to buy armed drones by Homeland Security? Mr. ADERHOLT. No. Mr. DICKS. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the en bloc amendment offered by the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Aderholt). The en bloc amendment was agreed to. [...]